Eagle Forum Action: March 2026

Here is the Zoom link

Orlean Koehle invites you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.

Topic: Eagle Forum Monthly Webinar
Time: Mar 23, 2026 07:00 PM Pacific Time (US and Canada)
Every month on the Fourth Monday

Join Zoom Meeting
https://sugarsalem.zoom.us/j/84233136230?pwd=wfbxFJ4fLTLrlcn4bzMAucOmyxIX95.1

Meeting ID: 842 3313 6230
Passcode: xNQkm0

---

One tap mobile
+16694449171,,84233136230#,,,,*941288# US
+16699006833,,84233136230#,,,,*941288# US (San Jose)

---
The full title of the slide presentation is “Smart Cities / Fifteen Minute Cities - Better Quality of Life and Well Being” or Will they Lead to “Total Control and Digital Prisons?”

This is part of the series of talks that will be presented at our Eagle Forum of California state conference on April 25 in the Calvary Chapel Pacific Coast, 6400 Westminster Blvd, Westminster, CA, 92683 from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

The theme of the conference is: "What Does the Future Hold for You - Will it Lead to Total Control?"

The other three speakers are: Patrick Wood, Alex Newman and Tom DeWeese speaking on AI, Technocracy” and “Transhumanism, What is Happening to our Property Rights and Zoning Protections, The Real ID - are we forced to accept it or not? And CBDC - digital ID and a Cashless Society." It is full of important information that you won't want to miss.

Go to eagleforumca.com / events to register or send your $50 check ($90 for couples) to PO Box 94, Huntington Beach, CA 92648.

Also for those of you in the Sonoma County area, Orlean will be giving the same presentation this coming Thursday evening, March 26, starting at 6:30 p.m. - 8:30 at the Round Table Pizza, 2065 Occidental Rd. Santa Rosa, CA 95403. Call Capt. Phil Graf to RSVP at 707-823-9059.

We also recommend watching an amazing YouTube documentary coming from England where the Smart City / Fifteen Minute Cities idea is much farther advanced. It is called "The Agenda - Their Vision, Your Future." You will see both Patrick Wood and Alex Newman in the documentary, revealing some very scary information.

We hope you can join us tonight and some of you in person, Thursday night.

Blessings:

Orlean Koehle

CEO Eagle Forum of California

"For God, Family, and Country"

BooksForTruth.com

YIKES!!! LAST MINUTE HELP NEEDED IN GEORGIA!!!

March 19, 2026. The 2004 Georgia Legislature wisely rescinded a dozen previously passed applications asking Congress to call a convention under Article V. Then a decade later, they turned around and passed the Convention of States and Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA) applications, the latter of which expired on Jan. 1, 2020.

For several years, the US Term Limits application was introduced, made it through the Georgia Senate, and died languishing in the House Rules Committee for the rest of the session. But apparently that party is over. In Feb., 2025, the application once again passed the Georgia Senate and didn't budge—for more than a year. Then, with no public notice, it was sent to the House Rules Committee where it passed yesterday. Next it was sent immediately to the House floor, where it is already on the calendar for final passage. The House debate/vote can be as soon as tomorrow; the session closes April 2.

We need your help!!! Please write all Georgia Representatives and tell them why they should vote "NO" on SR 23. At the debate, House members are sure to hear from proponents how popular "congressional term limits" is in the polls; and that their application will serve just to scare Congress into term limiting itself. (None of the Reps voting are under term limits - just a thought).

The Legislation

Here's the Article V Convention application we oppose in the Georgia House:

SR 23. (US Term Limits). Passed the Senate Feb., 2025. Passed the House Rules Committee Mar. 18, 2026. Can be debated/voted on the House floor as soon as Fri., Mar. 20, 2026 @ 10:00 am (EDT).

Your House Letter:

Talking Points are below the addresses.

Please send a letter to all 177 Georgia House members, and urge them to VOTE "NO" on SR 23, and any application asking Congress to call a convention under Article V.

Copy the addresses below as a block into “BCC,” and copy your own address into the “To” box; and place the bill# and description on the subject line. Something simple like "VOTE NO on SR 23 (Art. V convention)" will work.

Representatives Addresses

House Republicans (99)—Dear Representative: (If you're a Republican or conservative, tell the Republicans so!)

victor.anderson@house.ga.gov, bethany.ballard@house.ga.gov, carter.barrett@house.ga.gov, matt.barton@house.ga.gov, shaw.blackmon@house.ga.gov, josh.bonner@house.ga.gov, james.burchett@house.ga.gov, jon.burns@house.ga.gov, charlice.byrd@house.ga.gov, mike.cameron@house.ga.gov, beth.camp@house.ga.gov, joe.campbell@house.ga.gov, chas.cannon@house.ga.gov, kasey.carpenter@house.ga.gov, john.carson@house.ga.gov, johnny.chastain@house.ga.gov, mike.cheokas@house.ga.gov, david.clark@house.ga.gov, rob.clifton@house.ga.gov, sharon.cooper@house.ga.gov john.corbett@house.ga.gov, brent.cox@house.ga.gov, clint.crowe@house.ga.gov, buddy.deloach@house.ga.gov, katie.dempsey@house.ga.gov, robert.dickey@house.ga.gov, sandy.donatucci@house.ga.gov, matt.dubnik@house.ga.gov, emory.dunahoo@house.ga.gov, chuck.efstration@house.ga.gov, ginny.ehrhart@house.ga.gov, chris.erwin@house.ga.gov, bill.fincher@house.ga.gov, tim.fleming@house.ga.gov, jaclyn.ford@house.ga.gov, lehman.franklin@house.ga.gov, houston.gaines@house.ga.gov, matthew.gambill@house.ga.gov, gerald.greene@house.ga.gov, joseph.gullett@house.ga.gov stan.gunter@house.ga.gov, leesa.hagan@house.ga.gov, matt.hatchett@house.ga.gov, lee.hawkins@house.ga.gov, scott.hilton@house.ga.gov, bill.hitchens@house.ga.gov, soo.hong@house.ga.gov, mitchell.horner@house.ga.gov, jutt.howard@house.ga.gov, david.huddleston@house.ga.gov, rick.jasperse@house.ga.gov, david.jenkins@house.ga.gov, jan.jones@house.ga.gov, todd.jones@house.ga.gov, noelle.kahaian@house.ga.gov, trey.kelley@house.ga.gov, john.lahood@house.ga.gov, rob.leverett@house.ga.gov, eddie.lumsden@house.ga.gov, chuck.martin@house.ga.gov,

reynaldo.martinez@house.ga.gov, karen.mathiak@house.ga.gov, danny.mathis@house.ga.gov, derrick.mccollum@house.ga.gov, lauren.mcdonald@house.ga.gov, steven.meeks@house.ga.gov, martin.momtahan@house.ga.gov, kimberly.new@house.ga.gov, mark.newton@house.ga.gov, angie.o'steen@house.ga.gov, butch.parrish@house.ga.gov, don.parsons@house.ga.gov, holt.persinger@house.ga.gov, jesse.petrea@house.ga.gov, alan.powell@house.ga.gov, matt.reeves@house.ga.gov, trey.rhodes@house.ga.gov, carmen.rice@house.ga.gov, Gary.Richardson@house.ga.gov jason.ridley@house.ga.gov, jordan.ridley@house.ga.gov, steven.sainz@house.ga.gov, mitchell.scoggins@house.ga.gov, devan.seabaugh@house.ga.gov, deborah.silcox@house.ga.gov, lynn.smith@house.ga.gov, tyler.smith@house.ga.gov, vance.smith@house.ga.gov, ron.stephens@house.ga.gov, steve.tarvin@house.ga.gov, darlene.taylor@house.ga.gov, brad.thomas@house.ga.gov, rick.townsend@house.ga.gov, will.wade@house.ga.gov, dale.washburn@house.ga.gov, bill.werkheiser@house.ga.gov, noel.williams@house.ga.gov, bruce.williamson@house.ga.gov, bill.yearta@house.ga.gov,

House Democrats (78)—Dear Representative:

solomon.adesanya@house.ga.gov, segun.adeyina@house.ga.gov, kimberly.alexander@house.ga.gov, akbar.ali@house.ga.gov, michelle.au@house.ga.gov, sylvia.baker@house.ga.gov, imani.barnes@house.ga.gov, debra.bazemore@house.ga.gov, arlene.beckles@house.ga.gov, eric.bell@house.ga.gov, bryce.berry@house.ga.gov, debbie.buckner@house.ga.gov, rhonda.burnough@house.ga.gov, lisa.campbell@house.ga.gov, park.cannon@house.ga.gov, doreen.carter@house.ga.gov, jasmine.clark@house.ga.gov, omari.crawford@house.ga.gov, terry.cummings@house.ga.gov, viola.davis@house.ga.gov, robert.dawson@house.ga.gov, demetrius.douglas@house.ga.gov, saira.draper@house.ga.gov, karla.drenner@house.ga.gov, stacey.evans@house.ga.gov, robert.flournoy@house.ga.gov, spencer.frye@house.ga.gov, carl.gilliard@house.ga.gov, eric.gisler@house.ga.gov, lydia.glaize@house.ga.gov, floyd.griffin@house.ga.gov, sharon.henderson@house.ga.gov, tangie.herring@house.ga.gov, scott.holcomb@house.ga.gov, betsy.holland@house.ga.gov, el-mahdi.holly@house.ga.gov, karlton.howard@house.ga.gov, carolyn.hugley@house.ga.gov, derrick.jackson@house.ga.gov, edna.jackson@house.ga.gov, mack.jackson@house.ga.gov, anissa.jones@house.ga.gov, sheila.jones@house.ga.gov, legaide@kendrickforgeorgia.com, regina.lewis-ward@house.ga.gov, marvin.lim@house.ga.gov, karen.lupton@house.ga.gov, dewey.mcclain@house.ga.gov, mekyah.mcqueen@house.ga.gov, tanya.miller@house.ga.gov, billy.mitchell@house.ga.gov, angela.moore@house.ga.gov, LC.Myles@house.ga.gov, yasmin.neal@house.ga.gov, gabe.okoye@house.ga.gov, phil.olaleye@house.ga.gov, mary.oliver@house.ga.gov, esther.panitch@house.ga.gov, miriam.paris@house.ga.gov, sam.park@house.ga.gov, brian.prince@house.ga.gov, tremaine.reese@house.ga.gov, shea.roberts@house.ga.gov, ruwa.romman@house.ga.gov, david.sampson@house.ga.gov, gabriel.sanchez@house.ga.gov, maryann.santos@house.ga.gov, kim.schofield@house.ga.gov, sandra.scott@house.ga.gov, michael.smith@house.ga.gov, patty.bentley@house.ga.gov, rhonda.taylor@house.ga.gov, long.tran@house.ga.gov, anneallen.westbrook@house.ga.gov, david.wilkerson@house.ga.gov, al.williams@house.ga.gov, maryfrances.williams@house.ga.gov, inga.willis@house.ga.gov,

Thank you for defending our Constitution!

Talking Points—for Either Party

Choose just one, or write your own. Or paste/modify a very short letter suggestion at the end of this blast.
https://x.com/casey_whalen/status/2020984012941193299

Note: Often links, their associated paragraphs, and/or suggested short messages within each blast have been updated or are appropriate for that particular blast only. So make sure any suggestions you copy for the purpose of this blast, are from the section below— and not from a former blast:

This 14-minute CLIP from an Idaho floor debate on similar legislation to Georgia's SR 23, is must viewing for every representative to listen to before voting on Georgia's Term Limits application. Rep. Ilana Rubel (D) and Rep. Judy Boyle (R) hit it out of the ballpark in presenting bipartisan opposition to a similar application in Idaho last month. They refute the false arguments that the convention lobby has been inundating legislators with for a decade. [https://x.com/casey_whalen/status/202098401294119329

US Term Limits lobbyists usually testify, that there will never be a convention, and they don't want a convention. They claim history proves that Congress always proposes its own Amendment when enough states pass applications asking them to call a convention. Thus, the lobbyists assure you that there will never be a runaway convention! “Threatening Congress with Article V Applications” demolishes their argument. State Legislators who vote to apply to Congress for a convention, while trusting that Congress will never call a convention, are playing with fire.

US Term Limits continually tells legislators that a huge percentage of voters support congressional term limits, according to POLLS that either don't mention or don't explain the dangers of an Article V convention. A poll which focuses on "term limits," while ignoring the risks of an Art. V convention, is irrelevant and not a true measure of public opinion on their application. Ask US Term Limits, if they're so popular among grassroots citizens, why did 93% of the $7.4 Million in revenue last reported (2023) come from 3 individuals?!

US Representatives and US Senators have introduced proposed constitutional amendments for congressional term limits. See H.J.Res. 12; H.J.Res. 5; H.J.Res. 94; S.J.Res. 1; S.J.Res. 2; or S.J.Res. 48. This would eliminate the need for Legislatures to risk a constitutional convention by applying to Congress for one. With congressional amendments already on the table, a resolution backing them makes far more sense than applications that could inadvertently lead to a runaway convention.

"State Legislatures cannot dictate Amendments to be considered at an Art. V Convention" shows that lobbyists' assurances that Congress can't call a Convention until they receive applications from 34 states asking for the same Amendment, are false. A proposed Congressional "call," H.CON.RES. 15 (2025-2026), proves that Congress might combine all applications together—including centuries-old, obsolete and rescinded applications—to reach the 34-State threshold! This contradicts what convention lobbyists have been telling State Legislators for years to falsely assure them that a convention can't run away.

"State Legislatures have no power to select & control Delegates" shows that Congress decides the number and selection process for Delegates. Furthermore, Delegates have the "self-evident" Right "to alter or to abolish” our existing "Form of Government," as recognized by the Declaration of Independence, 2nd para. So, no one has power over Delegates! But lobbyists falsely assure state legislators that State Legislatures would control the convention—so they'll vote for applications that risk our Constitution.

The “Brilliant Men”flyer shows that James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, four US Supreme Court Justices, and other jurists and scholars warned that Delegates to an Article V convention can't be controlled.

"What the Convention Lobby Isn't Telling You About the Declaration of Independence” shows why Delegates to an Article V convention have the power to throw off the Constitution we have and set up a new one, with a new and easier mode of ratification. The only power State Legislatures are granted under Article V is to ask Congress to call a Convention.

"WHO has the POWER to do WHAT under Article V..." shows that the only power State Legislatures have been granted by the Constitution respecting an Article V Convention, is to apply to Congress for Congress to call the convention. Period. The 2nd page exposes a number of myths fabricated by the convention lobby.

Term Limits were in our first Constitution, the Articles of Confederation, Article V, end of p.1 & p.2. Here's why the Framers left them out of our current Constitution in 1787:

Talking Points for Democrats Only:

Under Article V of the U.S. Constitution, Congress is required to hold a constitutional convention if two-thirds of state legislatures (34 states) call for one. But here’s the catch: there are absolutely no rules for an Article V Convention outlined in the Constitution. That means the group of people convening to rewrite our Constitution could be totally unelected and unaccountable. There is nothing that could limit the convention to a single issue, so the delegates could write amendments that revoke any of our most cherished rights . . . In short, an Article V Convention would be a disaster.

Or:

You might quote from Chief Justice Warren Burger's LETTER to Phyllis Schlafly dated June 22, 1988:

“...[T]here is no effective way to limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitutional Convention. The Convention could make its own rules and set its own agenda...After a Convention is convened, it will be too late to stop the Convention if we don’t like its agenda…”

Suggestions for Very Short Letters

Short talking points below can be used for easy follow-up letters:

1. The Constitution grants State Legislatures NO power to select or control Delegates to an Art. V Convention.

2. There's no such thing as a limited convention.

3. Delegates to a convention called by Congress under Art. V would have more power than state legislators and Congress put together. They could rewrite our Constitution with an easier ratification process—like they did in 1787.

4. Don't believe the high-powered US Term Limits lobbyists who tell legislators that there will never be a convention—but that you should vote for the application anyway, in order to scare Congress into proposing the Amendment themselves. That's playing with fire!

5. According to Art. V, the only power granted to State Legislatures is the power to ask Congress to call a convention, period. Legislatures cannot dictate the scope of the convention.

6. The subject matter of the application doesn't matter. The subject is only bait to get your vote. Delegates can't be limited by subject, or anything else.

7. This is not the political environment to be having a convention and opening up our Constitution.

8. We're more likely to lose our Constitution at a convention called by Congress under Art. V, than to get the Amendment we ask for.

9. No Amendment is worth losing our Constitution and our Form of Government over!

Pages

Join Us for Illinois Eagle Forum!

☎️HB 960/ Election Bill We want-VOTE TODAY

Please call, text and email Republican Senator to VOTE “YES” on HB 960

☎️GA House Poised to Pass Unsecure Voting System

California: Please join us for the EFCA Zoom Webinar at 7:00 p.m. tonight

☎️ GEORGIA: URGENT SR 23 UPDATE

URGENT SR 23 Update

SR 23

YIKES!! Last Minute Help Needed in Georgia🚨🚨