Eagle Forum: 200 W 3rd St., Ste. 502 • Alton, IL 62002 • 618-433-8990
Showing posts with label South Carolina. Show all posts
Showing posts with label South Carolina. Show all posts

South Carolinians support the Governor's veto!


Eagle Forum National Constitutional Issues Chairman

Janine Hansen, 775-397-6859, director@nevadafamilies.org

June 9, 2026, In the Year of Our Lord



From Judi Caler; judicaler@caavc.net


SOUTH CAROLINIANS—ACTION ALERT!!!

Letters & Calls to Support Gov. McMaster’s Veto

You can find your legislator's contact information Here:

www.scstatehouse.gov


Please ask your South Carolina State Representative & Senator to SUPPORT Governor McMaster's Veto of H. 3558.



June 9, 2026. YAY! Governor McMaster vetoed H. 3558, South Carolina’s bill to "control" Delegates to an Art. V convention. And now we need your help to quash an effort to override the veto.


The most effective calls and letters to legislators are from their own constituents. Please call and leave short phone and online messages for both your State Representative and your State Senator, asking them to support the Governor's veto of H. 3558, the deceptive Art. V delegate bill.


What makes H. 3558 Deceptive? Delegate bills are useless for their stated purpose, i.e. to control Delegates. But they are useful in deceiving Legislators into thinking they can prevent a runaway convention.


So the latest CON is to insist that when a majority of State Legislatures (26) pass Delegate “control” bills, it would be impossible for a convention to run away. But if State Legislatures have no power to select & control Delegates to an Art. V convention, then neither do 26 (or even 50) State Legislatures! It’s that simple.


South Carolina doesn’t need a phony Delegate “control” law, the sole purpose of which is to acclimate legislators to the idea that a constitutional convention is safe. Please ask your South Carolina State Representative & Senator to SUPPORT Governor McMaster's Veto of H. 3558.

Let’s go get ‘em!


The Legislation

H. 3558 (Delegate "control" bill)—VETOED by Governor McMaster on May 20, 2026. The Legislature can overturn the Governor's VETO by 2/3 vote of both Houses, when in Session—as soon as this Thursday, but more likely next week. Please call & write ASAP.


Call & Write Your State Representative & Senator


Suggestions for Talking Points, short emails, and phone messages are at the end of this blast, or write your own. And/or simply ask them to please "Back the Governor's Veto of H. 3558—the deceptive Art. V delegate bill."


If you don't know who your State Representative and State Senator are or how to contact them, you can look them up on this nifty South Carolina webpage. Enter your address, and click on the state legislators' names to find a phone number and their online forms to fill in. Look for "Send Message to Representative or Senator (e.g.) Jones." Be sure to let them know you're a constituent.


Thank you for defending the Constitution!


Talking Points—for Either Party


Use your own words as much as possible, so we don't all sound alike! Choose one, write your own, or see 1-2 sentence messages below these Talking Points. And ask the legislators to BACK the Governor's VETO of H. 3558:


"State Legislatures cannot dictate Amendments to be considered at an Art. V Convention" shows that lobbyists' assurances that Congress can't call a Convention until they receive applications from 34 states asking for the same Amendment, are false. A proposed Congressional "call," H.CON.RES. 15 (2025-2026), proves that Congress might count all applications together—including centuries-old, obsolete and rescinded applications—to reach the 34-State threshold! This contradicts what special interest lobbyists have been telling State Legislators for years to falsely assure them that a convention can't run away.


"State Legislatures have no power to select & control Delegates" shows that Congress decides the number and selection process for Delegates. Furthermore, Delegates have the "self-evident" Right "to alter or to abolish” our existing "Form of Government," as recognized by the Declaration of Independence, 2nd para. So, no one has power over Delegates! South Carolina doesn't need a deceptive delegate law that is useless for its stated purpose, and serves only to make legislators feel good about passing Applications that risk our Constitution.


The “Brilliant Men” flyer shows that James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, four US Supreme Court Justices, and other jurists and scholars warned that Delegates to an Article V convention can't be controlled.


Here is a collection of opinions from two former Supreme Court Justices, a retired U.S. District Court Judge, and nine nationally reputed professors of law who say that a constitutional convention 1) cannot be limited to a single issue, and 2) can become a runaway convention.


"What the Convention Lobby Isn't Telling You About the Declaration of Independence” shows why Delegates to an Article V convention have the power to throw off the Constitution we have and set up a new one, with a new and easier mode of ratification. The only power State Legislatures are granted under Article V is the power to ask Congress to call a Convention.


"WHO has the POWER to do WHAT under Article V..." shows that the only power State Legislatures have been granted by the Constitution respecting an Article V Convention, is to apply to Congress for Congress to call the convention. Period. Delegates perform a federal function when they convene at an Art. V constitutional convention. They aren't subject to state law, i.e., delegate bills.


Suggestions for Short Letters & Phone Calls


Use your own words as much as possible, so we don't all sound alike. You can send a Talking Point (above); Or select & modify just one message below for a letter or phone call; or write your own. And ask the legislators to BACK the Governor's VETO of H. 3558.


1. State Legislatures can't control Delegates to an Art. V Convention.


2. Delegates to a Convention called under Art. V would have more power than state legislators and Congress put together. They aren't subject to State Laws like Delegate "control" bills or limitations in the applications.


3. Congress has never called a convention under Article V, so one knows what will happen. Delegate bills deceive State Legislators into thinking they can control Delegates—so they'll vote for applications that risk our Constitution.


4. We need to rescind all South Carolina's Article V applications asking Congress to call a convention—so they don't inadvertently trigger a runaway convention—not pass useless Delegate laws to make legislators feel good about voting for dangerous applications!


5. Conventions called by Congress under Art. V can't be limited.

South Carolina: Ask to uphold Governor's Veto


Eagle Forum National Constitutional Issues Chairman

Janine Hansen, 775-397-6859, director@nevadafamilies.org

June 2, 2026, In the Year of Our Lord



From Judi Caler; judicaler@caavc.net


SOUTH CAROLINA ACTION ALERT

Help Needed to SUPPORT the Governor’s Veto!!!


June 1, 2026: Your letters work! Governor McMaster VETOED H. 3558, South Carolina’s deceptive Delegate “control” bill! And now we need to quash an effort to override the veto.

H. 3558 is a feckless Delegate bill that is being promoted in multiple states by CON lobby operatives to falsely assure State Legislatures that they can control Delegates to an Article V Convention. The bill ostensibly prevents Delegates from straying at a constitutional convention—via an oath, instructions, criminal penalties, an oversight committee to discipline and tattle on Delegates, etc. But states can’t supersede the US Constitution and Art. V with a state law. It’s unconstitutional.


WHY Is H. 3558 Deceptive?


Delegate bills are useless for their stated purpose, i.e. to control Delegates. But they are useful in deceiving Legislators into thinking they can prevent a runaway convention. So the latest CON is to insist that when a majority of State Legislatures (26) pass Delegate “control” bills, then it would be impossible for a convention to run away. But if State Legislatures have no power to select & control Delegates to an Art. V convention, then neither do 26 (or even 50) State Legislatures! It’s that simple.


The good news is that grassroots citizens are fighting back. Right now, due to a barrage of states’ rescinding all their applications, over 1/3 of the States (17) have no applications whatsoever. Thus the path to the 34-state threshold needed to trigger a constitutional convention per Article V is blocked. But Delegate “control” bills create phony momentum and buy the CON Lobby time to trigger a convention to rewrite our Constitution while getting around Article V any way they can; for examples, see HERE, HERE, and HERE.


Letters & 2 Calls to SUPPORT the Governor's Veto of H. 3558


South Carolina doesn’t need a phony Delegate “control” law, the sole purpose of which is to acclimate legislators to the idea that a constitutional convention is predictable and safe. Please ask South Carolina Representatives to SUPPORT Governor McMaster's Veto of H. 3558. And make just two phone calls.

Let’s go get ‘em!


The Legislation


H. 3558 (Delegate "control" bill)—VETOED by Governor McMaster on May 20, 2026. The Legislature can overturn the Governor's VETO by 2/3 vote of each House, when in Session—as soon as June 10, 2026. Please write ASAP.


Your Letter


Please write a letter to the following 87 South Carolina House members and tell them why they should Vote to SUPPORT the Governor's Veto of H. 3558, the Delegate "control" bill. One or two sentences will do! See "Talking Points" or suggestions for short emails below the addresses.


Copy the addresses below as a block into “BCC,” and copy your own address into the “To” box; and place the bill# and description on the subject line. Something simple like "Support Governor's VETO of H. 3558" will work. Republican Representatives (52) Dear Representative. If you're a Republican or conservative, tell them so!


LucasAtkinson@schouse.gov, WilliamBailey@schouse.gov, thomasbeach@schouse.gov, PhillipBowers@schouse.gov, GaryBrewer@schouse.gov, MikeBurns@schouse.gov, PaulaCalhoon@schouse.gov, DonChapman@schouse.gov, BillChumley@schouse.gov, NealCollins@schouse.gov, HeatherCrawford@schouse.gov, AprilCromer@schouse.gov, AdamDuncan@schouse.gov, SaritaEdgerton@schouse.gov,

GregFord@schouse.gov, StephenFrank@schouse.gov, CraigGagnon@schouse.gov, GilGatch@schouse.gov, NormanGibson@schouse.gov, ThomasGilreath@schouse.gov, ThomasGuest@schouse.gov, PatrickHaddon@schouse.gov, WilliamHager@schouse.gov, RobHarris@schouse.gov, ThomasHartnett@schouse.gov, CharlesHartz@schouse.gov, HarrietHolman@schouse.gov,

WilliamHuff@schouse.gov, JayKilmartin@schouse.gov, KathyLanding@schouse.gov, johnlastinger@schouse.gov, BrianLawson@schouse.gov, StevenLong@schouse.gov, JosiahMagnuson@schouse.gov, DavidMartin@schouse.gov, RyanMcCabe@schouse.gov, JohnMcCravy@schouse.gov, diannemitchell@schouse.gov, ScottMontgomery@schouse.gov, AlanMorgan@schouse.gov, DennisMoss@schouse.gov, MikeNeese@schouse.gov,

JordanPace@schouse.gov,LukeRankin@schouse.gov, RichardSanders@schouse.gov, CarlaSchuessler@schouse.gov, HeathSessions@schouse.gov, JackieTerribile@schouse.gov, DavidVaughan@schouse.gov, JosephWhite@schouse.gov, BillWhitmire@schouse.gov, PaulWickensimer@schouse.gov,


Democrat Legislators (35):


TerryAlexander@schouse.gov, CarlAnderson@schouse.gov, JustinBamberg@schouse.gov, HeatherBauer@schouse.gov, BethBernstein@schouse.gov, BillClyburn@schouse.gov, GildaCobbHunter@schouse.gov, ChandraDillard@schouse.gov, KambrellGarvin@schouse.gov, WendellGilliard@schouse.gov, JerryGovan@schouse.gov, HamiltonGrant@schouse.gov, ChrisHart@schouse.gov, JackieHayes@schouse.gov, RosalynHendersonMyers@schouse.gov, LonnieHosey@schouse.gov, LeonHoward@schouse.gov, JermaineJohnson@schouse.gov,

WendellJones@schouse.gov, JohnKing@schouse.gov, RogerKirby@schouse.gov, JasonLuck@schouse.gov, AnnieMcDaniel@schouse.gov, JAMoore@schouse.gov, RobertReese@schouse.gov, MichaelRivers@schouse.gov, SethRose@schouse.gov, ToddRutherford@schouse.gov, keishanscott@schouse.gov, TiffanySpannWilder@schouse.gov, LeonStav@schouse.gov, courtneywaters@schouse.gov, DavidWeeks@schouse.gov, SpencerWetmore@schouse.gov, RobertWilliams@schouse.gov,


Just 2 Phone Calls


Suggestions for phone messages are at the end of this blast, or write your own.


We need all the help we can get! Convincing legislators to back the Governor’s Veto won’t be easy. H. 3558 passed by a supermajority in both houses, and Legislators don’t expect to be deceived by lobbyists and by the language of their own bills. Case in point: Republican Reps. Josiah Magnuson and John McCravy, who consistently oppose an Article V convention, voted FOR H. 3558—probably thinking that attempting to “control” the Delegates couldn’t do any harm.


Please leave messages for both House members letting them know that Delegates to an Art. V convention aren't subject to State law. And H. 3558 only pretends to control Delegates in order to gain momentum needed to trigger an Article V convention. The phone numbers below are public information on the SC website.


Rep. Josiah Magnuson: (803) 212-6876 (Capitol Office 24/7); (864) 420-7933 (cell).


Rep. John McCravy: (803) 212-6939 (Capitol Office 24/7)

Note: If you live in South Carolina, please call your State Representative also.


Thank you for defending the Constitution! 

Talking Points—for Either Party


Choose one, write your own, or see 1-2 sentence messages below these Talking Points. And ask the legislators to SUPPORT the Governor's VETO of H. 3558:


"State Legislatures cannot dictate Amendments to be considered at an Art. V Convention" shows that lobbyists' assurances that Congress can't call a Convention until they receive applications from 34 states asking for the same Amendment, are false. A proposed Congressional "call," H.CON.RES. 15 (2025-2026), proves that Congress might count all applications together—including centuries-old, obsolete and rescinded applications—to reach the 34-State threshold! This contradicts what special interest lobbyists have been telling State Legislators for years to falsely assure them that a convention can't run away.


"State Legislatures have no power to select & control Delegates" shows that Congress decides the number and selection process for Delegates. Furthermore, Delegates have the "self-evident" Right "to alter or to abolish” our existing "Form of Government," as recognized by the Declaration of Independence, 2nd para. So, no one has power over Delegates! South Carolina doesn't need a deceptive delegate law that is useless for its stated purpose, and serves only to make legislators feel good about passing Applications that risk our Constitution.

The “Brilliant Men” flyer shows that James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, four US Supreme Court Justices, and other jurists and scholars warned that Delegates to an Article V convention can't be controlled.


Here is a collection of opinions from two former Supreme Court Justices, a retired U.S. District Court Judge, and nine nationally reputed professors of law who say that a constitutional convention 1) cannot be limited to a single issue, and 2) can become a runaway convention.

"What the Convention Lobby Isn't Telling You About the Declaration of Independence” shows why Delegates to an Article V convention have the power to throw off the Constitution we have and set up a new one, with a new and easier mode of ratification. The only power State Legislatures are granted under Article V is the power to ask Congress to call a Convention.

"WHO has the POWER to do WHAT under Article V..." shows that the only power State Legislatures have been granted by the Constitution respecting an Article V Convention is to apply to Congress for Congress to call the convention. Period. Delegates perform a federal function when they convene at an Art. V constitutional convention. They aren't subject to state law, i.e., delegate bills or compacts between State Legislatures pretending to control them.


Suggestions for Short Letters & Phone Calls


You can send a Talking Point (above); select or modify just one message below for a letter or phone call; or write your own. And ask the legislators to SUPPORT the Governor's VETO of H. 3558.


1. State Legislatures can't control Delegates to an Art. V Convention.


2. Delegates to a Convention called under Art. V would have more power than state legislators and Congress put together. They aren't subject to State Laws like Delegate "control" bills or limitations in the applications.


3. Congress has never called a convention under Article V. No one knows what will happen. Delegate bills deceive State Legislators into thinking they can control Delegates—so they'll vote for dangerous applications.


4. We need to rescind all South Carolina's Article V applications asking Congress to call a convention—so they don't inadvertently trigger a runaway convention—not pass useless Delegate laws to make legislators feel good about risking our Constitution!

Ask Governor of S Carolina to Veto Article V Delegate bill


Eagle Forum National Constitutional Issues Chairman

Janine Hansen, 775-397-6859, director@nevadafamilies.org

May 18, 2026, In the Year of Our Lord


From Judii Caler: judicaler@hotmail.com



EMERGENCY ALERT SOUTH CAROLINA!!!

Gov. McMaster: VETO H. 3558 (Delegate Deception)


May 17, 2026. Last Wednesday, during the end-of-session rush, the South Carolina Senate pushed through H. 3558, a Delegate "control" bill, which passed the House and had been languishing in the Senate for a year with no action. Its last step is approval by the Governor.


This is part of a concerted effort—from ALEC on down—to push delegate bills of all varieties. The object is to convince States that if a majority of states (26) pass delegate "control" laws, it would be impossible for the convention to run away. Of course this is nonsense, since their theory is based on the false premise that State Legislatures can pass laws that supersede Article V & the US Constitution.


In our Republic, a constitutional convention is the highest authority in the land—above State Legislatures, Congress, and the President. Delegates can exercise their plenipotentiary powers and rewrite the Constitution, as recognized by the Declaration of Independence, para. 2. Nothing in Article V grants State Legislatures any power over Delegates, including States being able to select their own Delegates or restrict them in any way.


South Carolina doesn't need a delegate law that is useless for its stated purpose (to control Delegates) and serves only to deceive legislators in States without applications, into passing applications that can trigger a convention where we're likely to lose our Constitution.


This one is easy! Please email and call South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster and ask him to VETO H. 3558. And ask your friends & family to do the same!


The Legislation to Veto

H. 3558 (Delegate "control" bill)—Must be VETOED on or before Wed., May 20, 2026. But if the Governor signs the bill between now & then, he cannot veto—so please write ASAP—a sentence or two is enough! Just One Letter

See suggestions for short letters and calls at the end of this blast.


If you're from South Carolina, leave your address or City & State when writing.


Please write to Governor Henry McMaster as soon as possible before Wednesday, and let him know why he should VETO H. 3558 (Delegate "control" bill):


Dear Governor McMaster:

Subject line: e.g., Veto H. 3558—Art. V Delegate "Control" Send to the address of L. Lemoine, his Deputy Chief of Staff:


llemoine@governor.sc.gov,


Just One Phone Call


See suggestions for short letters and calls at the end of this blast.


Please call & leave your name & a short message as soon as possible before Wednesday—telling the Governor why he should VETO H. 3558 (Art. V Delegate Bill). If you're from South Carolina, also leave your address or City when calling or writing.


Governor McMaster:

803.734.2100

(Weekdays 8:30 am - 5:00 pm (Eastern)


Note: If you're unable to call during office hours, you can leave your name & message 24/7 at (800) 734-1229. Thank you for defending our Constitution! 


Suggestions for Short Letters & Calls

Select or modify just one message each for a letter & phone call or write your own. Sign or state your name and—if you're from South Carolina—your City in SC. And ask the Governor to VETO H. 3558 (Art. V Delegates).


  • State Legislatures can't control Delegates to an Art. V Convention—with or without delegate "control" laws.
  • Delegate "control" bills are useless for their stated purpose. The convention lobby uses them solely to deceive legislators into thinking State Legislatures have the power to prevent a runaway convention—so they'll vote to pass dangerous applications.
  • Since Delegates to an Art. V convention can't be controlled by State Legislatures, 26 State Legislatures passing Delegate bills can't control Delegates either. Delegate "control" bills are a marketing ploy to trick legislators in other states into passing unpopular Art. V convention applications.
  • Delegates to a Convention called under Art. V would have more power than State Legislatures and Congress put together. They aren't subject to State Laws like delegate "control" bills or restrictions in the applications.
  • Congress has never called a convention under Article V. No one knows what will happen. Delegate bills deceive State Legislators into thinking they can control delegates—so they'll vote for dangerous applications.
  • There's no such thing as a limited convention. Delegate "control" bills are a gimmick to make legislators feel good about passing dangerous applications. Thus they can trigger the very runaway convention their backers falsely claim to prevent.
  • South Carolina should be rescinding its applications, rather than passing useless delegate "control" bills to make legislators in other states feel good about triggering a convention that risks our Constitution.
  • This is your opportunity to create a legacy of defending our Constitution from those who would bargain away our liberties at an Art. V Convention.
  • No delegate "control" law can change the fact that State Legislatures are granted no power under Article V, except to ask Congress to call a convention. Period.
  • Delegate "control" bills are a gimmick to pretend a convention called by Congress under Article V can't run away—in order to pass applications in states that are rightfully concerned about a runaway convention.


"State Legislatures have no power to select & control Delegates" (1-page flyer) shows that Congress decides the number and selection process for Delegates. Furthermore, Delegates have the "self-evident" Right "to alter or to abolish” our existing "Form of Government," as recognized by the Declaration of Independence, 2nd para. So, no one has power over Delegates! But lobbyists push delegate control bills in order to falsely assure legislators that they can prevent a runaway convention—so legislators can feel good about passing applications that risk our Constitution.